Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin  Buss's avatar

"The idea that living is a slow revelation, one that, when approached correctly, produces its own desire to continue, is beautiful to me. Answers to philosophical or psychological knots within us are often untangled by time alone, solutions provided in the eternal revelation of being."

...I could not agree more, and at more than twice your age, I have seen this play out time and again. I used to not trust this. I do know. I have come to rely on it, as best I can, based on my awareness and presence at the time.

They key is "correctly". Honesty is central to this. So is a kind of radical openness.

Expand full comment
Rod Warner rdoubleumusics's avatar

Larkin was a minor lyric poet who seemed old before his time. Rilke, for all his faults and there were many, was one of the great poets of the 20c and beyond. Compare Larkin with fellow Brit Geoffrey Hill, who died a couple of years back, a stern frequently difficult poet on several levels. A working class boy who made good academically , spoke several languages, was totally embedded in his native language, English. Still a controversial figure who never fitted in to academe. If the best critics are those like Hill, who come from inside the language: insert your own list(!), as I think they do, he was up at the top of his game. A radical voice, not in the old fashioned clunky Marxist sense, his last book even veers toward rap rhythms. As you may have gathered, I’m not a fan of Larkin. Prefer Frank O’ Hara. My canon runs from way back to Mark E. Smith through Hill…

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts